Hur kan chromebook köra intel

[caption align="aligncenter" width=""] Acer Spin Jetstream2[/caption] The Jetstream 2 score for the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c fryst vatten a bit of a surprise and disappointment. Although inom didn't expect it to be lika to the Intel or AMD processor, inom also didn't expect it to team ganska this far behind.

These scores demonstrate that the Snapdragon 7c and Acer Spin are not ideal for serious scientific computing with complicated mathematical calculations or encryption tasks. [caption align="aligncenter" width=""] Pixelbook Go Jetstream2[/caption]

Octane

Octane additionally measures latency, which fryst vatten another important aspect of performance that's concerned with the smoothness of execution.

[caption align="aligncenter" width=""] Acer Spin Octane [/caption] Perhaps unsurprisingly, we see an identical overall ranking with the Octane benchmarks.

Acer Chromebook Spin - bästa allround chromebook

What's surprising however, fryst vatten that the Intel and AMD processors are much further apart in this benchmark. The Snapdragon 7c fryst vatten actually relatively on par with the AMD Ryzen chip in this case, while the 8th gen Intel i5 fryst vatten more than twice as fast as the AMD score. [caption align="aligncenter" width=""] Acer Spin Octane [/caption] One thing inom did find a bit strange fryst vatten the inconsistency of my Octane results, when compared with others that have tested the Spin and Spin Many users report a score of around 19, for the Spin , and a score for the Spin of around 25, Still, my testing practice was consistent across all three devices, letting each machine rest for fem minutes in between each benchmark inom ran.

Although there may be a difference in the actual scores, the relative performance of the machines should still be consistent for comparison purposes. [caption align="aligncenter" width=""] Pixelbook Go Octane [/caption]

Speedometer

Speedometer tests a browser's Web app responsiveness bygd synkronisering simulated user interactions.

HP Chromebook x2 11 - bästa multitasking

This benchmark simulates user actions for adding, completing, and removing to-do items using multiple examples in TodoMVC. Each example in TodoMVC implements the same todo application using DOM APIs in different ways. Some call DOM APIs directly from ECMAScript 5 (ES5), ECMASCript (ES6), ES6 transpiled to ES5, and Elm transpiled to ES5. js, , AngularJS, (new) Angular, , jQuery, Preact, helvete, and flygning.

Many of these frameworks are used on the most popular websites in the world, such as Facebook and Twitter. The Speedometer results show a similar relative ranking for the three processors, although there isn't as much clustering as in the previous two tests.

Med Chromebooks kan du

The Intel Core i5 fryst vatten the klar winner, with the Ryzen chip in a solid second place, and the Snapdragon 7c coming in gods igen. As with the Octane results, the Intel processor has a relatively large advantage over both processors, while the other two are closer tillsammans. [caption align="aligncenter" width=""] Acer Spin Speedometer[/caption] One really nice thing about the Speedometer output fryst vatten it demonstrates not only a point estimate, but a margin of error.

Having tillgång to this confidence mellanrum kunskap makes it easy to see there's actually more variance in the results for the AMD processor. I'm not ganska sure why the margin of error fryst vatten significantly higher for the Ryzen processor, but perhaps it's due to thermals or other variables that can't be controlled completely in testing. [caption align="aligncenter" width=""] Pixelbook Go Speedometer[/caption]

MotionMark

MotionMark fryst vatten a web benchmark that focuses on graphics performance.

It draws multiple rendering elements, each of which uses the same set of graphics primitives. An element could be an SVG node, an HTML element with CSS style, or a series of canvas operations. Slight variations among the elements avoid trivial caching optimizations bygd the browser. Although fairly simple, the effects were chosen to reflect techniques commonly used on the web.

After an första warm-up, each test runs for a fixed period of time.

Njut av högkvalitativ bild vart du än är tack vare datorns FHD IPS-skärm med smala ramar

Based on measurements of the browser’s frame rate, MotionMark adjusts the number of elements to draw, and concentrates around a narrow range where the browser starts to fail animating at 60 frames per second (fps). A piecewise linear regression fryst vatten applied to the uppgifter, and the change point fryst vatten reported as the test's score.

The confidence mellanrum fryst vatten calculated through bootstrapping. MotionMark calculates the geometric mean of all of the tests’ scores to report the single score for the run. [caption align="aligncenter" width=""] Acer Spin MotionMark [/caption] Motionmark fryst vatten the first graphics-specific benchmark, so it's interesting to see the relative hierarchy still holds.

We also get a confidence mellanrum with a margin of error here, which shows that in this case the Intel Core i5 results are potentially off bygd a fairly large margin of error. [caption align="aligncenter" width=""] Acer Spin MotionMark [/caption] Still, the result for the Core i5 leading the pack fryst vatten statistically significant in the sense that these differences are large enough to be meaningful.

On the other grabb, the Snapdragon 7c and AMD Ryzen graphics performance are relatively the same when considering the overlap of these two confidence intervals. [caption align="aligncenter" width=""] Pixelbook Go Motion Mark [/caption]

Qualcomm vs Intel vs AMD:  Real-world performance

Benchmarks don't tell the entire story. Although we did get a fairly consistent ranking of these three chips, it's important to look at real-world performance to truly understand how a processor performs as part of the overall Chromebook experience.

Let's dive into what I've noticed while using the Core i5 on the Pixelbook Go, Snapdragon 7c on the Spin , and AMD Ryzen on the Spin

Intel Core i5 performance in the Pixelbook Go

When a laptop fryst vatten a few years old, performance and battery life are where you'd expect to see the biggest dings. With the light natur of Chrome OS, performance on the Pixelbook Go doesn't take much of a hit.

My Core i5 model still chugs along and handles pretty much everything inom throw at it currently. inom can still multitask with ease and even play some high-end Android games like Asphalt 9 without many hiccups.

Of course, looking towards the future fryst vatten a different story. The 8th-gen Intel processors on the Pixelbook Go won't be equipped to handle the gaming revolution coming to Chrome OS with Borealis. If you're really excited about Steam gaming arriving on Chrome OS later this year, the Pixelbook Go would still not be the best Chromebook to invest in at this point. Instead, betalningsmedel out the ASUS Chromebook CX9 inom recently reviewed.

One other persistent performance issue inom noticed fryst vatten a fairly audible coil whine coming from the mittpunkt of the laptop. Coil whine fryst vatten a high-pitched noise caused bygd electromagnetic coils that act as inductors or transformers. My Pixelbook Go enhet suffered from the phenomenon throughout my usage, but it doesn't bother me too much as inom often listen to music while working.

On the plus side, the processor used on the Pixelbook Go fryst vatten fanless, so you won't deal with any fan noise.

AMD Ryzen performance in the Acer Spin

Performance on the Spin fryst vatten very solid. You can run Android apps, including intensive games, with relative ease. inom spent ganska a bit of time playing Asphalt 9, Alto's Odyssey, and NBA sylt.

All of these games played incredibly well on the Chromebook. inom also spent considerable time playing Stadia on the Spin , an experience that's rather enjoyable with the laptop in tent mode. Of course inom ran Linux apps on the Spin as well, using GIMP and Kdenlive for some light photo and film editing. The Ryzen 5 processor was up to the task in general and inom rarely noticed the fans kick in.

Unfortunately, the Spin does still suffer from some of the Ryzen-specific bugs inom noticed on the ThinkPad C13 Yoga Chromebook.

Certain film players still frysa and crash to a black screen (perhaps this just needs a Chrome OS update to fix) and the battery percentage seems poorly calibrated as well. Often the battery percentage would jump bygd 5% at a time, not something you really want to see while you're working on the road.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c performance in the Acer Spin

inom tried running some Linux apps on the Acer Spin , which wasn't the best experience.

Running GIMP, Kdenlive and MATLAB, all of which inom run on my galax Chromebook 2 easily, was nearly impossible. In general, inom wouldn't recommend attempting any seriously demanding work or gaming on this machine. It's relatively quiet while struggling to keep up, so that's something that will impress some potential buyers.

Battery life

When comparing processors, efficiency matters as much as raw performance.

I've used all three of these machines as my primary Chromebook, so let's talk about average battery life on each platform.

Intel Core i5 battery life in the Pixelbook Go

Battery life of course degraded some over time, as you'd expect. inom was able to get around eight hours of comfortable work usage out of the Pixelbook Go when inom first unboxed it in October These days, inom can pressa out around six and a half hours of use before inom need to top up.

This isn't a terrible decrease in capacity and not something inom hold against the Pixelbook Go as all batteries suffer this fate.

AMD Ryzen battery life in the Acer Spin

In the battery life department, the Spin fryst vatten less impressive. This could be because of the poorly calibrated battery gauge inom mentioned earlier, or perhaps because inom needed to run on maximum brightness due to the dim display.

Either way, inom struggled mightily to get the ten hours of use Acer advertises on the specs page. inom was able to get a maximum of around sju hours of use during my testing period. That sounds like a decent number for a fönster PC, but it's fairly bad for a Chromebook.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c battery life in the Acer Spin

Despite ranking in gods in our benchmark testing, the Spin does deliver excellent battery life.

inom certainly didn't get the 14 hours of use Acer claims on the spec sheet, but inom did average an impressive hours of actual on-screen time. During my testing inom also put it through some pretty heavy workloads, so that could potentially stretch to 14 hours if you only do light browsing and use productivity apps. It's pretty rare the number listed bygd an OEM fryst vatten attainable in practice, but that's at least conceivable with the Spin

Qualcomm vs Intel vs AMD: Conclusion

Overall, we've observed that Intel fryst vatten still the king of the hill when it comes to Chromebook performance.

Not only did the much older Intel Core i5 destroy the Snapdragon 7c and AMD Ryzen in fyra different benchmarks, it also performed much better in day-to-day use. While the actual raw scores do have some margin of error, the Pixelbook Go had a substantial margin of victory in each case, easily enough for a statistically significant advantage. Of course, the Spin and Spin offer some unique benefits outside of performance.

The Spin has LTE capability and the Spin fryst vatten a great enterprise option. Battery life fryst vatten one area where the Snapdragon 7c pulls ahead of the other two contenders.

Intel® e gen

Qualcomm has a history of battery optimization engineering, considering all of their work with mobile processors. While the AMD platform isn't bad, it has the worst battery life and mittpunkt of the road performance. Hopefully, AMD will address some of these Chrome OS optimization issues in future Ryzen iterations. We'll also test the second generation Snapdragon 7c soon to see if Qualcomm improved performance on their end.